Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5,105
Posts
5,983
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
5,983
Votes |
5,105
Posts

Another anti-REI trap in the tax reform, Senate version

Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Posted

My favorite tax analyst, Toni Nitti of Forbes, posted this troubling article. Here is the short version:

The Senate version limits the 23% deduction afforded to pass-through entities to the 50% of the wages paid by the business. For passive investors with high cash flow, this means NO deduction in most cases. 

Basically, if the Senate version passes, landlords with positive net income will not have any break - in contrast to the tax rate reduction offered in the House version.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,407
    Posts
    754
    Votes
    Lance Lvovsky
    • Accountant
    • Fort Lauderdale, FL
    754
    Votes |
    1,407
    Posts
    Lance Lvovsky
    • Accountant
    • Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Replied

    @Brandon Hall That was my understanding as well. Toni does say this in his article:

    [Two notes on this deduction: the wage limitation does not apply if the business owner's income is less than $250,000 (if single, $500,000 if married).

  • Lance Lvovsky
  • Loading replies...