Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7,695
Posts
7,859
Votes
Caleb Heimsoth
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Durham, NC
7,859
Votes |
7,695
Posts

Impact of new tax bill (Forbes article)

Caleb Heimsoth
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Durham, NC
Posted
Here a good article by Forbes that breaks down a lot of the new stuff in the tax bill. It clearly mentions real estate at least twice. The author argues that those who sell real estate could be adversely affected because they’re eliminating or capping most deductions like property taxes and interest. And for live in flips you’d have to live there 5 out of 8 years to get the capital gains exclusion. On the flip side it looks like rental property owners are winners as they can take depreciation faster and get to deduct 23 percent of qualifying income. So it depends on what part of real estate you’re involved in to know how this would affect you. https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonynitti/2017/12/02/winners-and-losers-of-the-senate-tax-bill/#662579f6254d

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

62
Posts
44
Votes
Vlad K.
  • Realtor
  • Glastonbury, CT
44
Votes |
62
Posts
Vlad K.
  • Realtor
  • Glastonbury, CT
Replied

@Caleb Heimsoth The limitations would apply to personal only. For real estate investors there would be no limitations.

@Steve Vaughan There are areas of the country where middle and upper-middle class will be affected negatively, where new standard deduction is not going to cut it. In addition, the double standard deduction is a scam, especially for families with children. If you pay close attention to your tax return, you get two deductions (currently) - 1) standard or itemized and 2) personal exemptions. 

Just to put it in perspective, say for a family of four:

 - 2017 standard deduction $12,700 

 - 2017 personal exemption is $4,050 x 4 =  $16,200

So, right now, at a minimum, a family of four gets a deduction of $28,900, which will be replaced by $24,000, as personal exemptions are eliminated.

Moreover, most families who own a house and living in states with income taxes do itemize. Taking a modest house purchased at $300k, mortgage interest is about $10k-$11k / year (relatively new purchases). Add real estate taxes and state income taxes, and for many families itemized deductions are north of $20k.

Without going into many more details:

 - winners: single, and families who do not own a house

 - losers: families who own a house

There are exceptions in the categories above, so this is just a broad generalization.

Loading replies...