Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

138
Posts
71
Votes
Pearce G.
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
71
Votes |
138
Posts

Cost basis on subdividing

Pearce G.
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
Posted

I have a commercial zone property under contract that includes a building that I intend to hold for rental income and some additional vacant land that I intend to subdivide from the building and then flip.

For tax purposes, how is the cost basis allocated?  Is it split evenly between all the subdivided parcels?  Or is one of them deemed to be the original parcel with full cost basis and the other parcel(s) have zero cost basis?  If so, can I decide which parcel retains the cost basis?  Or is cost basis allocated by rule or appraisal or some other formula out of my control?

If the cost basis on the vacant land is zero, then I probably need to plan for a 1031 exchange when I sell it.  On the other hand, if I can assign the entire cost basis to the vacant land, then I will have little or no profit on the sale, and a 1031 is not necessary.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,044
Posts
9,405
Votes
Dave Foster
#1 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
  • St. Petersburg, FL
9,405
Votes |
9,044
Posts
Dave Foster
#1 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges
  • St. Petersburg, FL
Replied

@Pearce G., Yes different than broker-dealer.  This is more a distinction between investor/dealer.  Property used in a 1031 must be property which you intend to hold for productive use in business, trade or investment.  Property bought with the primary intent of reselling becomes inventory, is not eligible for 1031 and is taxed at ordinary income rates.

When you buy this property it is one property and easy to demonstrate your intent for the whole by how you treat the part - renting the building.  However, if you immediately spin off and sell the second parcel you're creating a new piece of real estate and it could very easily appear that your intent from the beginning was to resale that parcel.  This would make it inventory and not eligible for 1031.

Now, if you bought this piece thinking it was a great investment hold value and it came with some extra land you could use some day maybe then that reflects a different intent doesn't it?  You can demonstrate that intent by leaving it attached, or performing only a legal subdivision with no construction activity and holding on to it for a bit.  Then change your intent, decide to sell it and do a 1031.  

Your use of the word "flip" coupled with the actions of a quick subdivide and sale indicate that your intent is that of a dealer so your 1031 might be at risk if audited.

  • Dave Foster
business profile image
The 1031 Investor
5.0 stars
96 Reviews

Loading replies...