Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
374
Votes
Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
374
Votes |
1,096
Posts

tax implications for a small business

Mark Brogan
  • Investor
  • Roanoke, VA
Posted

I currently own a small plumbing business

I am trying to figure out if I am better off having employees on my payroll or having them on a 1099?

we currently work for a big box retailer that pays us on a 1099

my plumbing business is set up in an s corporation

thanks for your help

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,561
Posts
2,285
Votes
Brandon Hall
  • CPA
  • Raleigh, NC
2,285
Votes |
1,561
Posts
Brandon Hall
  • CPA
  • Raleigh, NC
Replied

@Sylvia B. You most certainly can "choose what you want" as long as you model your business appropriately. For instance, instead of hiring a full-time employee, you hire a part-time vendor who is free to take on other clients. You build a business around that type of model and now you only have contractors on staff rather than employees.

@Mark Brogan from a dollar perspective, it's much more costly to hire an employee. You have payroll, insurance, additional overhead, benefits, new overtime rules, etc. A contractor incurs all of those costs instead. You just pay their fee and be done with it.

As an aside from an efficiency perspective, it could be argued that a full-time employee will bring more efficiency to the table. I've not yet been in business long enough to test this, but I feel that contractors could bring much more efficiency to the table as they are compensated in a manner that inspires innovation.

I'm a big believer in results only compensation. I still haven't figured out how you can pay employees based on results unless they are paid on commission.

Loading replies...