Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

161
Posts
24
Votes
Jeff Caravalho
  • Property Manager
  • Sacramento, CA
24
Votes |
161
Posts

Solo 401k VS SD IRA

Jeff Caravalho
  • Property Manager
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

I read on another post that IRA custodians don't like solo 401k's because they don't get commission. Can someone explain to me the fees & services for a solo 401k vs a SD IRA. I'm self-employed & had someone recommend the SD IRA over the solo 401K, which counters what others on this forum have said (ie. solo 401K is great for the SE)

Another dilemma I have is the fact I want my 1st rental for the tax advantages, IE. I would like to work on it, manage it, etc. - I know that's prohibited. Question is do I have the cart before the horse? Should I acquire 1st property outside of my IRA to get tax advantages THEN acquire IRA properties after that? Thx.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,271
Posts
2,325
Votes
Steven Hamilton II
  • Accountant, Enrolled Agent
  • Grayslake, IL
2,325
Votes |
5,271
Posts
Steven Hamilton II
  • Accountant, Enrolled Agent
  • Grayslake, IL
Replied
Originally posted by @Jeff Caravalho:

I read on another post that IRA custodians don't like solo 401k's because they don't get commission. Can someone explain to me the fees & services for a solo 401k vs a SD IRA. I'm self-employed & had someone recommend the SD IRA over the solo 401K, which counters what others on this forum have said (ie. solo 401K is great for the SE)

Another dilemma I have is the fact I want my 1st rental for the tax advantages, IE. I would like to work on it, manage it, etc. - I know that's prohibited. Question is do I have the cart before the horse? Should I acquire 1st property outside of my IRA to get tax advantages THEN acquire IRA properties after that? Thx.

 ALWAYS SOLO 401K. The main advantage is matching contributions and you can fund more. Second is that on real estate transactions inside the account there is no UBIT.

Acquire wherever you can afford to first. Notes and transactional funding is the best thing inside a retirement account. That is not to say rentals are a bad item to hold there. The depreciation deduction isn't as important inside a solo 401k.

You can manage it, you just cannot do work without being paid FMV from the account. I recommend not doing that at all. But you can hire non linear family member to do said work and it would not be a prohibited transaction.

  • Steven Hamilton II
  • [email protected]
  • (224) 381-2660
  • Loading replies...