Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
6
Votes
Frances Regalado
  • Investor
  • Pasadena, CA
6
Votes |
16
Posts

Avoiding Probate

Frances Regalado
  • Investor
  • Pasadena, CA
Posted

Good Evening,

Scenario In California:

You're named Executor of a Living Trust with a piece of real estate, which you find was refinanced multiple times and not put back into the name of the Trust. 

If you petition the court (in California) to get the real estate back into the Trust to avoid Probate, how much work does this involve? How likely is it that the Court will allow it back into Trust? What type of fee would you expect a lawyer to charge for such action?

I'm asking, as I'd like to find out if an estimate recently rec'd is fair? Property was only held in deceased name. I'll call another lawyer to get a 2nd quote, but if anyone has any idea about a reasonable fee, I would appreciate hearing about it.

Thanks,

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1
Posts
1
Votes
Ken Kossoff
  • Thousand Oaks, CA
1
Votes |
1
Posts
Ken Kossoff
  • Thousand Oaks, CA
Replied

What you hope to be able to do is a "Heggstad Petition," named after a case.  You try to convince the court that the decedent intended the property to be owned by the trust even though title is not in the name of the trust.  Whether you can do so depends on (among other things) the language of the trust and whether the property was listed in a Schedule "A"  or similar attachment evidencing an intent to transfer real property into the trust.  The court may or may not care that the property was previously owned by the trust.  The scope of work is the drafting of a petition and possibly a supplement to that petition, attending at least one hearing, drafting (hopefully) an order transferring the property into the trust, and then ensuring that a certified copy of the order is recorded.  I would expect most attorneys who are experienced in the field to charge at least $3500, plus the filing fee ($435, a bit more in some counties which charge for court reporters); others will charge at least $5,000.  You might be able to find a young attorney who does not know what he is doing to do it for less, but that can be risky because if you blow it, then you've spent that money but still need a full blown probate proceeding.  Also, if the documentation does not support a Heggstad petition, you may want an experienced attorney to tell you that before you try it.  Good luck.  

Loading replies...