Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

147
Posts
41
Votes
Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
41
Votes |
147
Posts

Disregarded Entity Qualification: Married Couple in Community Property State

Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Rev. Proc. 2002-69

I found this guidance and thought I would provide a summary:

It was issued to remove uncertainty surrounding treatment of an entity owned solely by a husband and wife in a community property state.

Essentially, if that entity is a "qualified business entity", and the husband and wife choose to treat it as a disregarded entity, the IRS will respect that classification.

On the flipside, if they choose to treat it as a partnership for Federal tax purposes, and file a partnership return, the IRS will accept that the entity is a partnership for Federal tax purposes.

A business entity is a qualified entity if:

1) The business is wholly owned by a husband and wife as community property under relevant laws,

2) No person other than one or both spouses would be considered an owner for Federal tax purposes,

3) The entity is note treated as a corporation under Reg. 301.7701-2

Loading replies...