Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

147
Posts
41
Votes
Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
41
Votes |
147
Posts

Oversimplified Cost Seg Example

Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Let's say a rental property gets 12k in rental income, passive.

Cost seg gets 50k, resulting in passive activity loss of around 38k.

The amount of passive losses carries from the Sch E to the 8582 to determine the loss allowed.

In this case I assume no other passive activities and no active participation exception.

In this case the amount paid for the cost seg is worthless and may be for several years, especially considering rent may stay stable while other expenses have not been accounted for which add to the depreciation carryforward and add to the chance of limitation (in this very over simplified example).

No losses are allowed on Schedule E, which flows to Schedule 1, to the front page of the 1040.

Again, just a simple demonstration of the flow of the return.

Loading replies...