Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

147
Posts
41
Votes
Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
41
Votes |
147
Posts

Oversimplified Cost Seg Example

Eric Williams
  • Accountant
  • Houston, TX
Posted

Let's say a rental property gets 12k in rental income, passive.

Cost seg gets 50k, resulting in passive activity loss of around 38k.

The amount of passive losses carries from the Sch E to the 8582 to determine the loss allowed.

In this case I assume no other passive activities and no active participation exception.

In this case the amount paid for the cost seg is worthless and may be for several years, especially considering rent may stay stable while other expenses have not been accounted for which add to the depreciation carryforward and add to the chance of limitation (in this very over simplified example).

No losses are allowed on Schedule E, which flows to Schedule 1, to the front page of the 1040.

Again, just a simple demonstration of the flow of the return.

Loading replies...