Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

540
Posts
298
Votes
Shafi Noss
  • Investor
  • Nationwide
298
Votes |
540
Posts

Is Depreciation Worth Anything?

Shafi Noss
  • Investor
  • Nationwide
Posted

I see a lot of investors get excited about depreciation because property values usually go up, but investors can report they went down on their taxes.

I am skeptical this is actually an advantage.

For example, commercial real estate depreciates over 39 years. It doesn't seem crazy to me that a building would wear down to salvage value over four decades if not maintained. 

Property values appreciate because of inflation, increased demand, and value-add and these increase the price more than the property wear-down decreases the price. 

But because this happens at the same time, it is hard to see the property would have appreciated even more if not for the wear-down, and therefore the depreciation is just neutral. 

Depreciation can't be applied to W2 income so does not allow a tax arbitrage, appreciation from inflation is neutral because everything else is more expensive too, and only the value-add items are allowed to be depreciated on a fresh schedule, plus there is depreciation recapture at the end. 

So I don't see any tax hacks or loopholes in this. Just seems like a fair way to account for building wear-down and people get confused easily because depreciation happens by itself and early, whereas the property value is mixed together at the same time. 

What do you guys think?

Loading replies...