Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

114
Posts
48
Votes
Gagan P.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Austin, TX
48
Votes |
114
Posts

Depreciation Carryforward vs Standard Deduction

Gagan P.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Just had a random question pop up into my head.

Given that the IRS requires depreciation to be taken each year, what if a person's only income is rental income, and the AGI, is below the standard deduction amount. Can the depreciation just be carried forward instead? Or does it need to be applied until income is zero?


Example:

Net rent is $10,800

Standard Deduction (using 2023 number) is $13,800

Depreciation is $5,000

Does the depreciation need to bring the Net Income down to $5,800, OR can the standard deduction be used, and carry the depreciation forward?

I'm guessing the former, so the IRS gets more money in the end, but the latter makes sense since the depreciation didn't actually reduce taxable income in the year it had to be applied.

Thanks :)

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,105
Posts
5,982
Votes
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
5,982
Votes |
5,105
Posts
Michael Plaks
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied

@Gagan P.

Actually, your "random" question is a good one. Unfortunately, you're required to take depreciation even if it creates zero benefit to you. As in your case: if your taxes were already zero, you're essentially "wasting" depreciation by taking it in the same year. But you cannot "hold onto it" and apply it when it's beneficial, sorry.

By the way, you misquoted the IRS. What they say is that you must recapture all depreciation at the time of sale, both "allowed" (actually taken) and "allowable" (what you could have taken but did not). The result it that you don't benefit from NOT taking depreciation, in most cases.

What you want to do under the circumstances is to minimize current depreciation by electing the slowest available method and by allocating as much as possible to land.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...