Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

297
Posts
255
Votes
Kevin Luttrell
  • Lender
  • Orange County, CA
255
Votes |
297
Posts

CA form 568 for SMLLC with no activity?

Kevin Luttrell
  • Lender
  • Orange County, CA
Posted

Hi BP,

I have a single member LLC in Indiana with no property or income in CA, but still have to pay the $800 tax since I'm the managing member living in CA. The LLC only owns 1 rental property and cash flow is pretty minimal, so this $800 tax hurts a lot more. I'm thinking about deeding the property out of the LLC into my personal name to avoid the CA tax. I'd like to keep the LLC open though just in case I need it for something in the future.

My question is, if I keep the LLC open, do I still have to file form 568 and pay the CA tax even if the LLC has no income or expenses?

Loading replies...