Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28
Posts
13
Votes
Brian V.
  • Homeowner
  • Victorville, CA
13
Votes |
28
Posts

Is Subject to and the due on sale clause a risk worth taking?

Brian V.
  • Homeowner
  • Victorville, CA
Posted

I just bought 2 courses on Subject to. I'm ready to dive in. I've been studying all the material, methods, contracts, forms, and marketing ideas. Then after all the excitement, I came to a sudden crash--The dreaded "DUE ON SALE" clause.

I don't have much in my life, but I'm comfortable enough. I have a house, a new car, some money in the bank, zero debt except for the mortgage, and a small pension. Because I'm retired, I have unlimited amounts of time to invest.

The problem came up with the due on sale clause. If I have taken the deed subject to the owners financing and put a buyer in a land contract (or lease option) to buy the house, I'm going to have a big problem if the due on sale clause is executed. I don't have a good enough debt to income ratio or spare cash for a down payment to actually buy the house if the loan is called due. Then the bank would forclose, and I would have to break the contract with my buyer, who has given me a substantial down payment or option consideration.

Someone is getting sued, and I think that person is going to be me. The seller could sue me for not making the payments I promised to make. The buyer could sue me because he has a contract that allows him to buy the house. Perhaps even the bank could sue me, I'm not sure.

My question is, since the due on sale clause almost never gets called, is doing this business model a risk worth taking? I want to move forward, but the idea of losing everything doesn't sit well with me or my wife.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,609
Posts
2,991
Votes
David Dachtera
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Rockford, IL
2,991
Votes |
4,609
Posts
David Dachtera
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Rockford, IL
Replied

@Brian V.,

In general, as long as the payments are made, lenders find little value in asserting DoS.

Some lenders are exceptions, of course.

There is some risk in every REI venture. If you don't "have a plan in case the worst happens", get one. Otherwise, better to find a different strategy.

Loading replies...