Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

231
Posts
243
Votes
Anthony King
  • Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
243
Votes |
231
Posts

Is it ALWAYS best to put least amount down?

Anthony King
  • Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
Posted

What is the best way to compare mortgage options if the down payment and interest rate are dissimilar? I know a lot of people say to put the least amount of your own money into the deal as possible, but that can't always be the case.

For example I have two commercial lenders who have approved my purchase on a 16 unit multifamily.

Lender A wants 20% down, 6.6% interest on a 20 yr amortization.

Lender B wants 25% down, 5.91% interest on a 20 yr amortization.

Do I look at IRR or ROI at some point in the future to compare the two? Or something else?

If the 20% down option had an 9% interest rate, you'd probably be better off with the 25% down and 5.91% right? At some point the higher rate stops being worth the lower down payment, but how do you know when?

Thanks for the help!

  • Anthony King
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    13,366
    Posts
    19,402
    Votes
    Joe Villeneuve
    #4 All Forums Contributor
    • Plymouth, MI
    19,402
    Votes |
    13,366
    Posts
    Joe Villeneuve
    #4 All Forums Contributor
    • Plymouth, MI
    Replied
    Quote from @Anthony King:

    What is the best way to compare mortgage options if the down payment and interest rate are dissimilar? I know a lot of people say to put the least amount of your own money into the deal as possible, but that can't always be the case.

    For example I have two commercial lenders who have approved my purchase on a 16 unit multifamily.

    Lender A wants 20% down, 6.6% interest on a 20 yr amortization.

    Lender B wants 25% down, 5.91% interest on a 20 yr amortization.

    Do I look at IRR or ROI at some point in the future to compare the two? Or something else?

    If the 20% down option had an 9% interest rate, you'd probably be better off with the 25% down and 5.91% right? At some point the higher rate stops being worth the lower down payment, but how do you know when?

    Thanks for the help!

    Almost always with the lowest DP...period...end of story...depending on how far apart the spread between the two the interest rates.  The interest rate is important because it influences the eventual cash flow.  The DP is important because if the property is positive CF, the only cost to the REI will be the DP...and initially, the main role of the CF is to recover that cost.  The lower the DP, the less there is to recover, and the faster you get there.  This is important because your profit begins after your costs are recovered.  The type of property doesn't matter (i.e. SF, MF, etc...), it works the same for all of them.  However, if the interest rates are wide enough apart, even though it may take a little longer to recover with the larger DP, the higher DP might be the better choice.  My Magic Number is 6 months (possibly a year).  If the higher DP can still be recovered in less than a year longer than the lower one (6 months would be a gimme) then maybe I choose the higher DP.  It comes down to the actual number in dollars, and if I took the difference between the two DP's (in dollars, not %%%), and used it somewhere else, could I gain a higher return (again, in dollar$, NOT %%%) than the difference between the two cash flows.  If "yes", then I go with the lower DP.  If "no" then I go with the higher one...but never higher than 25%.  If I have to go over 25% DP I just won't buy the property.

    Using your numbers above, and applying them to the same SF property (this is a real property), you get the following:
    Assumptions

    PV/Buy - $200k
    CF before Mortgage Pmt applied - $1750/M; $21k/yr

    Option w/ Lender A
    - DP = 20%; I% = 6.6; Term = 30 yrs (the more years the better)
    DP = $40k
    CF w/MP = $750/m; $9k/yr
    Yrs to profit < 4.4 yrs

    Option w/ Lender B - DP = 25%; I% = 5.91; Term = 30 yrs (the more years the better)
    DP = $50k
    CF w/MP = $850/m; $10,200/yr
    Yrs to profit < 4.9 yrs

     


    Loading replies...