Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

388
Posts
138
Votes
Ali Samana
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frisco, TX, TX
138
Votes |
388
Posts

No more 30 year mortgage?

Ali Samana
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frisco, TX, TX
Posted

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Fixing-Housing-Crisis-Time-To-cnbc-1256002211.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=8&asset=&ccode=

An interesting article. Would it help or hurt the investment world if the government completely walked away from the housing industry?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

405
Posts
159
Votes
Kevin C.
  • Investor
  • McKinney, TX
159
Votes |
405
Posts
Kevin C.
  • Investor
  • McKinney, TX
Replied

Changes alluded to in the article (shorter terms, higher rates, pre-payment penalties, kill interest deduction) would make housing less affordable.

Banks would win with higher fees, government would win with increased tax revenue - the average Joe would lose.

Talk about reducing the potential buyers pool, but on the flip side, cash buyers and those that could afford shorter terms would make out like bandits.

I could see a huge increase in the need for rental homes if any of that played out - could be advantageous for certain investors.

Loading replies...