Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

20
Posts
2
Votes
Bruce Palomarez
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
2
Votes |
20
Posts

Underwriter issue with Oakland Duplex

Bruce Palomarez
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
Posted

Currently in Escrow to sell my Oakland duplex. The buyer is looking to move into one unit and his family into the other. This is an FHA loan and we are now past the 40 day mark and all contingencies have been removed.

On the day before we are due to close the underwriter wants a guarantee that the tenants will be vacated in 60 days. Considering the rent control laws, I myself cannot issue the owner move in notice because I am not the one who wants to move in. The buyer can't issue any notice because he is not on title. Any advice/experience with an issue like this?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied

Yeah, this is a legit glitch in the matrix in Oakland where reality doesn't really line up with what you see on the ground.

- City ordinance says the OMI eviction process can't start until the owner who will actually move in initiates it, and it takes a "minimum" of 60 days. 

- Mortgage guidelines want owner occupants moved in within 60 days.

- ???

You really can't buy tenant occupied real estate in Oakland, as an owner occupant, if your underwriter is going to be from Narnia or Detroit or whatever. You can't broker these ones, it has to be in-house & local underwriting, or exactly this comes up.

@Bruce Palomarez, it'll probably be resolved in a couple months. First the (presumably, out of state) underwriter must be educated on the fact that there is a state called California, and within that state is a county called Alameda, and within that county is a city called Oakland, and within that city there is a city council, and periodically that council has passed various ordinances, etc etc.

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...