Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

21
Posts
1
Votes
John Becker
  • Investor
  • Eleva, WI
1
Votes |
21
Posts

Rent to own properties unable to get Fannie Freddie Mortgage?

John Becker
  • Investor
  • Eleva, WI
Posted

I am doing the BRRRR strategy, and I have a great clean property that I was going to cash out finance. I was just told by my lender, that since my lease, had an addendum for Rent to own, that I could not get my mortgage approved without a form deleting the Rent to own provision.

The mortgage guy couldn't explain why this was the case, other than  if I were to sell the home, only the current tenant could buy it.?

Any lenders out there who can explain this condition? Is this accurate? Should I no longer offer the rent to own on my BRRRR properties?

Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by @John Becker:

I am doing the BRRRR strategy, and I have a great clean property that I was going to cash out finance. I was just told by my lender, that since my lease, had an addendum for Rent to own, that I could not get my mortgage approved without a form deleting the Rent to own provision.

The mortgage guy couldn't explain why this was the case, other than  if I were to sell the home, only the current tenant could buy it.?

Any lenders out there who can explain this condition? Is this accurate? Should I no longer offer the rent to own on my BRRRR properties?

Thanks

If the rent to own provision is dated prior to the closing of the loan you are seeking, and the lender is for whatever reason compelled to foreclose, a zillion lawyer fees would be incurred by the lender when a pro bono tenant's rights lawyer shows up to claim that the tenant's claim to the property is in position ahead of the lender's claim to the property because it predates it. The lease was signed before the mortgage, so the mortgage lender is in line after the tenant, the claim would essentially be.

The guideline specifically says...

Note the word used is "could," not "would." It's not relevant that you or I might disagree with what a lawyer should claim and which way a judge should rule. The cheap gov't subsidized money wants clean title and unencumbered real estate. 

Offer the rent to own after you're done financing/refinancing the home for X years, where X equals the length of the lease. 

I feel like some disproportionate % of posts on BP are from folks that stepped on one of financing mines that comprise the BRRRR minefield...

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...