Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

77
Posts
18
Votes
Steven Horvath
  • Real Estate Investor
  • houston, TX
18
Votes |
77
Posts

Refinancing from private to conventional based on property's income

Steven Horvath
  • Real Estate Investor
  • houston, TX
Posted

i think i can get a true private lender at 8-10 %, IO 2-3yr contract. i want to get the house to rent for cashflow. if i can capture 35 % equity and a positive cashflow, are there any actualy lenders that will look at cashflow and equity and not my income, debt to credit ratio, credit score, when it comes to refinancing to a conventional 30 yr fixed. I have 1 rental with atleast 25% equity, a 640 score which is getting better, and not much documented income. my main concern is being able to get refinanced within the 2 yrs i would hate to get a good rental with equity and cashflow and not be able to refiance, any thoughts?

Loading replies...