Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
James Tatlow
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Lender and flood insurance

James Tatlow
  • Investor
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

Hi BP -

I have encountered an odd situation that I want to run past the community.  

I have 2 duplexes under contract.  They are right next door to each other but are on separate APNs so the sale is being treated as two separate transactions.  I heard that another property in the neighborhood fell out of escrow because the lender was requiring flood insurance so I reached out to my insurance provider to get an estimate. The quote came back very expensive, expensive enough to be a deal killer.

I called my lender to find out if the loans would require flood insurance.  Their response was that one property would and the other would not!  I don't understand how this could be possible.  They are currently investigating why this is the case.

I guess i don't really have a question, just wanted to see if anyone had any insight.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

21,918
Posts
12,876
Votes
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
12,876
Votes |
21,918
Posts
Bill Gulley#3 Guru, Book, & Course Reviews Contributor
  • Investor, Entrepreneur, Educator
  • Springfield, MO
Replied

The top of the lowest part of the foundation must be 1 foot above the flood plain, if you house is in a flood plain but built on a mound or hill, a "spot elevation" by a surveyor is worth the engineer's assessment. You can usually study the topography in the area and tell if the subject property improvements are in peril. :)  

Loading replies...