Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

825
Posts
413
Votes
Jonathan Makovsky
  • Investor
  • Fairfield-New Haven-Hartford County, CT
413
Votes |
825
Posts

Avoid PG's (Personal Guarantees) for Limited Partners

Jonathan Makovsky
  • Investor
  • Fairfield-New Haven-Hartford County, CT
Posted

We are hoping to close a small commercial loan ~ $400K with limited [equity] partners in the deal. A number of banks we spoke with want all members with more than 25% interest in the property to hold PG's (Personally Guarantees). Our LP's would not be interested in this structure, is there a way around this?

A few options we thought of:

  • 1) Create a separate investment LLC that we are managing members of. (One bank said this would work, another one said it would not.)
  • 2) [NOT IDEAL] Have investors use different names (for example, wife, husband, kids, etc.) so that they do not own a 25%+ share.

Thanks in advance for feedback.

Loading replies...