Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
1
Votes
Jeff Daring
1
Votes |
9
Posts

Requirements for conventional - using income from rental

Jeff Daring
Posted

I was told by one broker today that I wouldn’t qualify for over a certain amount on a property because first time buyers with no landlord experience cannot use the rental income from the properties towards their qualification. Another broker told me this is not the case. The first broker said all banks must adhere to the requirements of conventional loans. This is my first property, I have been living rent free and have no landlord experience. I want to avoid a situation where a lender is telling me I’m prequalified and then there is a hiccup once we get under contract. Is there such a requirement? I am looking at a 4 unit for 400k and the place has 57k annual income. I was only approved for 385 based on my w-2 by broker one but broker two said I would be qualified well into the 500s bc the property has proven income. Which is correct? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,569
Posts
1,049
Votes
Jay Hurst
  • Lender
  • Dallas, TX
1,049
Votes |
1,569
Posts
Jay Hurst
  • Lender
  • Dallas, TX
Replied
Quote from @Jeff Daring:

I was told by one broker today that I wouldn’t qualify for over a certain amount on a property because first time buyers with no landlord experience cannot use the rental income from the properties towards their qualification. Another broker told me this is not the case. The first broker said all banks must adhere to the requirements of conventional loans. This is my first property, I have been living rent free and have no landlord experience. I want to avoid a situation where a lender is telling me I’m prequalified and then there is a hiccup once we get under contract. Is there such a requirement? I am looking at a 4 unit for 400k and the place has 57k annual income. I was only approved for 385 based on my w-2 by broker one but broker two said I would be qualified well into the 500s bc the property has proven income. Which is correct? 


 The key here is that you do not have a primary housing expense. Because you do not have a housing you cannot count the income from the subject property. IF you were paying rent, you could count the rent on the subject property.

https://selling-guide.fanniemae.com/sel/b3-3.1-08/rental-inc...

  • Jay Hurst
business profile image
Hurst Real Estate, INC
4.9 stars
75 Reviews

Loading replies...