Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 12 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

63
Posts
22
Votes
William C.
22
Votes |
63
Posts

Insights on our lending situation for a primary residence coupled with our rentals...

William C.
Posted

Summary: We have a small portfolio of SFH rentals. We are looking into acquiring a new PRIMARY residence. We would then turn our current home into a rental (again). We have only approached 1 lender (large, online only lender), but had issues getting them to understand our total situation so the amount they would lend to us was insufficient. Because 1 of our rentals (the Nevada one) is newer and does not appear on our past Schedule C, they chose not to recognize any of the income from that property. Even though we have a history of rental income at that property and a 2yr lease in place. Details below on our properties and our financial situation. Any similar experiences out there and/or approaches we should consider to get a lender that can understand the full scope?

Our current portfolio:

-Florida SFH: Mortgage (includes HOA and PM company) = $2100. Long-term tenant with signed lease. Rent = $2800.

-Nevada SFH: Mortgage (no HOA or PM company) = $3300. Long-term tenant with signed lease. Rent = $3300.

-Oregon SFH: Current primary residence. Mortgage = $1700. Previous recent history as a long-term rental where rental income was $2700.

Financial Snapshot: Both adults have solid W-2 jobs. Long track record of employment. Gross yearly income combined of $210,000. Outside of the mortgages, we have zero debts.

Home Search: Price range of $900,000. Would be putting 20% down ($180,000). We have that cash on hand and a cushion. So loan size would be around $720,000. No purchase is imminent, so no time crunch. We just want to be ready if the right home becomes available to us.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,141
Posts
602
Votes
Stephanie Medellin
  • Mortgage Broker
  • California
602
Votes |
1,141
Posts
Stephanie Medellin
  • Mortgage Broker
  • California
Replied

@William C.  

For rentals not yet showing on your tax returns (like your Nevada property), many lenders will use 75% of the monthly rent to offset your PITI. You may need to show receipt of a few months rent along with the lease. If it's a very new lease, you'd provide copies of the security deposit and first month's rent with proof of deposit.

For rental income reported on your schedule E, a different calculation will be used.

Your current primary residence can also be converted to a rental.  You will need a signed lease and first month's rent and security deposit, but you should be able to use 75% of the monthly rent.  

While some lenders could have stricter guidelines when it comes to length of rental income history, these are the standard conventional guidelines that most lenders follow.


Loading replies...