Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

70
Posts
5
Votes
Gary Kurtz
  • Investor
  • Nevada, MO
5
Votes |
70
Posts

question about 2nd note and trust deed

Gary Kurtz
  • Investor
  • Nevada, MO
Posted

Forgive me if I've posted this in the wrong forum. I'm reading R. Mike Weese's book 'Janitor to Multi-Millionaire" and I'm trying to wrap my head around the concept of him "...'creating' a 2nd note and trust deed...in the amount of $60,000." to be then used as a part of a down payment for a larger purchase.

In context he 'created' this second note and trust deed from a collection of properties that he owned and was renting. If it's a second note that means the first note and deed of trust was being held by whomever sold him the collection of properties - right? How can he make a second note and then have someone else hold a deed of trust on the same property? Was he in essence loaning himself the equity that he had in the collection of properties to use in helping him purchase the larger property?

I know this is probably a 'stupid' question for many but I'm not used to thinking like this and I'm trying to understand the concept and learn it's application. Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
3,331
Votes |
2,097
Posts
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • San Jose, CA
Replied
Originally posted by Gary Kurtz:
So he DID 'loan' the money to himself in the form of a 'loan obligation' (note)?

Gary,

To echo what Ellis said above, he borrowed more money and used the property as a collateral. Say he owes $100k (1st loan) on a property that's worth $200k. He went to the bank and asked for a $50k 2nd loan. Basically, he increased his leverage on the property. So his monthly mortgage payment obligation would also increase because he has to service two loans instead of one.

You can have as many loans on the house as you want, or as the lenders will loan. Btw, Rich Weese also posts on here so you may want to connect with him and ask as many specific questions as you would answer.

Loading replies...