Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
12
Votes
Matt Caresco
  • Investor
  • Lodi CA/Bend, OR
12
Votes |
10
Posts

Working Backwards - Selecting property based on required return

Matt Caresco
  • Investor
  • Lodi CA/Bend, OR
Posted

Hi Friends - 

I am a former Californian, currently moving to Bend OR. I am building my OOS portfolio in small multi and self-storage. I am playing with another approach to investments - viewing investments in order to meet a specific financial goal:

If I want to take on an extra $4k month expense, how can I find a property that will offset?

Has anyone started with the end number in mind, and worked backward to build criteria? For example - I need my property to cash flow $50K/Year. Now select a market, determine purchase price, minimum cash on cash return, cap rate, etc. 

Would love the community's thoughts!

Loading replies...