Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 18 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

39
Posts
2
Votes
N/A N/A
2
Votes |
39
Posts

Net Operating Expenses

N/A N/A
Posted

What do you qualify as net operating income? I've been using the Property Analysis Tool and removed all of my property expenses - taxes, mortgage, insurance, water, advertising, and some other small expenses directly from the rental income profits. I don't really consider that "net operating income". But some people said to take out 45-50% for "net operating income" (out of the income profits) but didn't explain if that is what it is for (advertising, utilities, etc.).

So, what do you consider net operating income?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

42
Posts
3
Votes
Replied

I can see both sides of this argument over whether it is accurate and/or useful to use 45-50% of gross rents as a an expense estimator. On any SINGLE PROPERTY your actual expenses could be very small or could be significantly more than the 50% of gross rents figure.

The thing is, you could be getting positive cashflow on 9 out of the 10 houses you bought using a house-to-house individual expense formula and still be bleeding money on your total investments because of that 10th house. For each and every property you analyze to purchase, you have to account for ALL of your other properties. By treating the expenses of your properties as a whole you prevent cashflow catastrophes from happening. You can take it in stride when your tenant trashes one of your houses because you had accounted for that bad egg by spreading the expense over all your properties.

And when your tenants all behave and have extended stays in your houses you are pleasantly surprised. Under-calculating your expenses is as dangerous as purchasing on the basis of speculative on price appreciation.

Loading replies...