Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

74
Posts
33
Votes
Olga M.
  • Investor
  • Lees Summit, MO
33
Votes |
74
Posts

Which would you pick and why? 3 investing scenarios...

Olga M.
  • Investor
  • Lees Summit, MO
Posted

Location: Kansas City Market/St. Joseph

Amount: $100,000 to invest

Conditions- inventory is low and crappy.
What would you do of the following and why?

Scenario 1- Invest all in new flip

Scenario 2 - Invest $50k in new rental ($14k gross/yr)/ Save $50k in case flip comes up

Scenario 3 - Wait until after January 5th to see what happens politically and economically.

Pick one and tell us why.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

441
Posts
285
Votes
Luther Wilson III
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Kansas City, MO
285
Votes |
441
Posts
Luther Wilson III
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Kansas City, MO
Replied

How about Scenario 2 with a bit of a twist...

What if you were to leverage that $50k by investing part of it into a BRRR and then hold the property as a contract for deed or seller finance deal instead of a rental? It might look something like this:

Let's say you're able to find a $120,000 house somewhere in the KC market and purchase it with the use of private or hard money...

You're able to purchase the house for $76,000 and it needs $20,000 in repairs. The ARV is $120k so you're "all in" at $96k which is 80% of the ARV.

Your private money lender does 70% LTV so that covers around $84,000. That means you'll need to come up with the rest... If you include your closing costs, loan fees, etc, that might come out to around $25k of the $50k that you've already allotted for the investment. It might not seem too good on the surface so far. Bear with me...

If you can do a cash out refinance at 75% LTV (which I'm sure you can) then you're looking at $90k being pulled out. The private money lender gets paid off (their $84k) and since they'll be some costs to do the refi (let's say $3k) that means afterwards you could have about 22,000 "left in the deal"... Still doesn't see that cool, does it?

Here's where it gets juicy: After you refinance, instead doing a regular rental, you do a contract for deed or seller carry and get a $20,000 down payment... You structure it so that you'll receive payments of $1,200/mth PITI each month, you'll have no maintenance costs and you won't have to hire a property manager. Essentially, you're the bank... All the while you're cash flowing each month and with just $2,000 "left in the deal." Run the #'s sometime... These deals usually turn out to be pretty sweet. ;)

Your own payment after the refi might be between $570 and $670/mth PITI perhaps lower if you get a really solid interest rate. I'd say that's pretty good cash flow and a real nice COC return. :)

  • Luther Wilson III
  • Loading replies...