General Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7804/d78040bb89cfa161a5126d9ad0fd8a449e5e7be2" alt="Jamelle Messinger's profile image"
2 Percent Test - 2020
Now I know that this test is just a ball park number and should be taken with a grain of salt, but in the book, "Rental Property Investing" by Brandon Turner, he gives an example on a $300,000 home with the rental income at $2,000 per month. He says when you take the purchase price and divide that by the rental income, you get 1.5%, so you would pass the 1.5% rule.
I've ran this calculation multiple times now thinking I'm just crazy but 2000/300000 does not = 1.5% it's 0.67%.
Can anyone explain to me how he gets this number? Maybe it's an error in the audio book (which is what I have) or the book itself?
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66afe/66afe3fe1d5f8079012c10ee97f469897d2c0493" alt="Marcus Auerbach's profile image"
- Investor and Real Estate Agent
- Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
- 6,464
- Votes |
- 4,493
- Posts
Your math is correct, must be a typo. 200,000 home with 3,000 rent is 1.5%.
In todays market 1% is pretty much where it's at.
- Marcus Auerbach
- [email protected]
- 262 671 6868
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66447/66447f3b7b3057879cd61e0617a674666b7ee8e2" alt="business profile image"