Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

170
Posts
28
Votes
Rob C.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
28
Votes |
170
Posts

Is it really that important to hire contractors that are insured?

Rob C.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
Posted

From what I've read in the forums it seems that conventional wisdom here is it's best to hire only contractors & handymen that are insured. I adopted this perspective when I started as a landlord as I tend to trust the biggerpockets community at large. Now though I'm starting to question that perspective. Many of the arguments for hiring insured contractors suggest that you'll want to place a claim on their insurance rather than yours when something happens (e.g. they get injured on your property). However, isn't that part of the reason I'm paying my insurance premiums- to protect me in an unexpected event? I understand not wanting to place a claim on your own insurance and risk higher premiums, but is it really worth paying extra for an insured handyman each time just to prevent that rare situation? It seems equivalent to paying for rental car insurance even though your auto insurance will offer coverage if you get in a collision. I'm interested to hear what others here think about this counter perspective. I'm still trying to make up my mind on this matter, and feedback always helps. For what it's worth, I'm thinking about all this with regard to miscellaneous maintenance & small jobs on a rental property rather than a full rehab. Although I'm not sure that should even make a difference- does it?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

927
Posts
950
Votes
Jon Kelly
  • Investor
  • Bethlehem, PA
950
Votes |
927
Posts
Jon Kelly
  • Investor
  • Bethlehem, PA
Replied

@Rob C. I've thought the same thing. A few comments might be helpful: 

1. In my opinion, it's not necessary for smaller, "low risk", jobs. But, you would want a contractor insured for larger, "high-risk" jobs.

2. Some jurisdictions require the contractor be insured. I'm currently completing a building permit and the Borough/County requires a minimum insurance coverage on the contractor 

3. In my experience (I understand this doesn't apply to all contractors), insured contractors are more expensive but also more professional than contractors w/o insurance. You can cut costs with a low budget contractor, but you get what you pay for

  • Jon Kelly
  • Loading replies...