Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

709
Posts
740
Votes
Matthew McNeil
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Boise/Portland
740
Votes |
709
Posts

Why F.I.R.E. isn’t a good idea? Because LIFE happens.

Matthew McNeil
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Boise/Portland
Posted

I come from healthy DNA stock. My maternal and paternal grandparents lived until their mid-90s. If I embrace F.I.R.E. at my age then I’m probably looking at 40 years until I die.

Reality check bullet points;

  1. F.I.R.E. presupposes that life is static.
  2. F.I.R.E. is falsely based on calculations when in reality they’re projections. For example, how do you take into account future inflation or the cost of a significant illness?

Working is a value. Productivity is a value. Retire at 35. Then what?

I appreciate that it works for some people who are putting it out there in articles, blogs, YouTube videos, and even writing books. But the fractional number of people who have retired early does not justify a movement where people may be misguided to make enormous sacrifices to achieve a goal only to be faced with a significant problem 20 years later.

Granted, many BP members may balk at this post.  However, I think we can all agree that applying some of the FIRE philosophy resonates with people, but in truth its more about pivoting control back into our hands and retiring early may not be the avenue to pursue that control.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,908
Posts
13,015
Votes
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
13,015
Votes |
4,908
Posts
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
Replied

Most people in the FIRE movement don't retire early.  They pursue FI instead and then do work in their field of choice.

The movement is more about aligning daily actions with values than it is about retirement.

Loading replies...