Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

38
Posts
20
Votes
Aaron Arnold
  • Rental Property Investor
  • St Joseph, Mo
20
Votes |
38
Posts

What’s your maximum number for single family homes?

Aaron Arnold
  • Rental Property Investor
  • St Joseph, Mo
Posted

I realize this is a totally subjective question but I’m going to ask it anyways. What’s the magic number for single family homes? How many is too many? How many for maximum efficiency? What’s the most you could self manage?

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • Specialist
  • Paradise Valley, AZ
2,935
Votes |
3,447
Posts
Account Closed
  • Specialist
  • Paradise Valley, AZ
Replied
Originally posted by @Aaron Arnold:

I realize this is a totally subjective question but I’m going to ask it anyways. What’s the magic number for single family homes? How many is too many? How many for maximum efficiency? What’s the most you could self manage?

 Nah, you don't want to self-manage. Do it the way I do. 

I find and buy a property "off market" using Subject To then I sell to a Tenant Buyer.

When I sell to a Tenant Buyer, since I am offering Terms that they otherwise can't get, I sell the property "As Is" for a "built in equity" of an additional $10,000 to $25,000 depending on the house. (I bump up the sales price what the value WILL be) then I get that (it is called "the back end" when they refinance or sell. The buyers are usually successful businessmen that can't get bank financing because they aren't W2. They have good income, money in the bank and want to buy a home.

I get a "down payment" up front of $20,000 to usually $25,000 then I get the monthly cash flow and then I get a "back end" equity payoff.

When I "Buy & Hold" and only rent it out, I have to take care of a tenant, fix the roof, replace the AC etc. Worry about them trashing the house, worry about vacancies. When I eventually have to replace the roof or AC it wipes out the profit from that house. The most I get up front is one month's rent. I continually have to find new sources of money for the next one, usually a bank. Bank's Stop Lending at 10 properties.

However, when I sell it to a tenant buyer, there are no real estate agent fees, I get $25,000 immediate cash, I don't have to worry about roofs, ACs, and tenants and I get the same cash flow. When the roof or AC goes, the Tenant Buyer owns the house, so he takes care of those. If the market tanks, my built in equity still exists. Each time I get a Tenant Buyer's down payment, that gives me Money to Buy the Next one and the Next one and the Next.

Pretty cool, eh?

Loading replies...