Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Holden Katechis
  • Atlanta, GA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Clearly Defining Roles of your Investing Partners

Holden Katechis
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted

It is commonly said that partnering is a great strategy when starting out. Say you partner with someone with no experience like yourself. How do you split the work and clearly define your roles? Or do you find leads, evaluate property, and decide on the correct deals properties together? It seems like if roles are clearly defined, then more will get done. BUT I don't see how to split up the work load. This is assuming all your other player's roles are set up i.e. lawyer, real estate agent, contractor, etc. So my question is, how has everyone else split up the workload with their Real Estate Investing Partners?

Loading replies...