Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

377
Posts
432
Votes
Rick Bassett
  • Property Manager
  • Greater New Haven, CT
432
Votes |
377
Posts

The Implications of Dodd/Frank Repeal

Rick Bassett
  • Property Manager
  • Greater New Haven, CT
Posted

I don't care if you love or hate the current tenant at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. This post isn't intended to be political.

I am curious to get the opinions of other BPers on what the investing road ahead/climate looks like for us if Dodd/Frank gets repealed, which seems pretty certain, and if corporate tax rates drop as the President has promised they will.

As an investor in many Buy/Hold SFR's I'm interpreting these signals to mean that there may be a potential lucrative opportunity for an sell-off exit strategy within the next several years.

What do you think?

Rick

  • Rick Bassett
  • 475-900-3100
business profile image
Bassett Property Management
4.9 stars
72 Reviews

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,136
Posts
5,080
Votes
Brie Schmidt
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
5,080
Votes |
6,136
Posts
Brie Schmidt
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
ModeratorReplied

I hope that if it is repealed, banks will be smart enough to keep their own standards of lending similar to how it currently exists.  What I learned from what happened is that the general public is stupid.  My husband and I still get in this argument over what happened.  He says it was the banks fault for offering the loans and being greedy, while I don't totally disagree it was the idiot consumer who bought a $700k house on a teacher's salary because the bank told them they could.  They should have known that they couldn't afford for 75% of their income to go to a mortgage payment.  I assimilate it with being mad at Walgreen's for selling cigarettes, the consumer choose to smoke and purchase them, Walgreen's should not be a fault if they bought them and died of lung cancer.  

It is also going to effect generations.  Anyone over 35 was an adult when it happened.  I think everyone in that age group knows someone who made a bad decision during that time and things went downhill for them.  So I am hoping even if the 80/20 interest only no doc loans are back, they will be smart enough to proceed cautiously.  Anyone under 35 wasn't old enough to really experience the aftermath of what went down, but they are "millennials" who have massive student loans, entry level jobs, and less desire to buy a house in the burbs and live the "American Dream." 

business profile image
Second City Real Estate
5.0 stars
20 Reviews

Loading replies...