Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brie Schmidt

Brie Schmidt has started 265 posts and replied 5874 times.

Post: Could someone please share the 2025 Chicago Residential Lease?

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Lee Burns:

Thanks Brie and yeah I heard about the flood disclosure addition.  What I really meant to ask  in my previous post was why the secrecy of sharing the 2025 lease when sharing in the below posts for previous years seemed welcomed with open arms.

1) https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/1086767-chica...

2) https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/1099650-chica...

3) https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/664/topics/1027556-2022...

4) https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/1093434-2023-...

Oddly enough, my question was answered in the below post by Nathan Gesner, but I'm still curious about the above posts

https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/1108701-chica...



 Because CAR started enforcing their copywrite on it

Post: Could someone please share the 2025 Chicago Residential Lease?

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Lee Burns:

I had a friend send me a copy, but what's different with the 2025 lease as opposed to the previous versions?


 Every year the city sets the interest rate that has to be included.  This year you also have to include a flooding disclosure

Post: Could someone please share the 2025 Chicago Residential Lease?

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Lee Burns:

Hi all!  I'm renewing a tenant's lease soon and would love to get an updated copy of the new CAR lease for 2025.  Could someone please provide a copy?


 It can not be shared as it is a copywritten document and owned by the Chicago Association of Realtors.  It can only be used by association members

Post: Northwest Side Preservation Ordinance : Call to Action

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114

The Northwest Side Preservation Ordinance, affecting certain Chicago neighborhoods, punishes owners of affordable housing, devalues their property, and makes it harder to invest in neighborhood housing. This is a problem for all of us and we need your help right now.

The Neighborhood Building Owners Alliance has put together a page with more detailed info and the ability to send an opposition email to all city council members ( nboachicago.com/nspo ) Please take a minute to share your disapproval even if you are not directly impacted by this ordinance. The NBOA will be aligning all the property owners to communicate updates to advocacy efforts with additional calls to action so please join their email list 

• Applies to SFH, condos, 2-4 units, mixed use and large apartment buildings.

• Allows tenants up to 9 months to purchase the building including 60 days’ notice before listing and up to 90 days after receiving an offer to decide to exercise their right of first refusal.

• Building owners have to turn over detailed information about their operations and finances, and even share their rent rolls, leases, and P&L statements with tenants and the DOH.

• Demolition fees of $60k and more wipes out decades of equity for distressed sellers.

• You can’t vacate units without just cause and you are required to keep tenants for 6 months after closing even if they are MTM or their lease expires, eliminating owner occupied buyers.

• Because of the long timeline, we can no longer execute 1031 exchanges.

• The tenants have the right to sell the contract to a third party for a profit.

This ordinance will drive out small, local owners, replacing them with cash-rich, out-of-town corporate owners. If this pilot program is deemed successful it can spread to the rest of Chicago or even Cook County and beyond. It will depress sales prices, even if there is a buyer willing to go through the hassle of dealing with this ordinance.

Get informed! Brie Schmidt Zdravkovic and Bob Floss have a video discussing the challenges and effects of this ordinance including how it has impacted the DC market since the 1980’s. Check out the video on YouTube @ChicagoBrie

Spread the word by sharing this on social media, with your friends and colleagues, and anyone you know who could be potentially impacted by this. We need to stop this now before it hurts us all.

Post: Should I keep or sell my 2 flat?

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Daniel Sar:

Debating on selling my 2 flat. When I look online, there’s not a lot of multi family properties on the market, but I don’t think I can list for more than 520k. Property is 4/2, 2000sq ft. Any insight would be greatly appreciated 


 Where is it?  Our market has been weird the last two years but anything priced right will still go under contract over asking price the first weekend

Post: Chicago Investors we have a serious problem : Call to Action

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Jonathan Klemm:

@Brie Schmidt - Keep it up!  Chicago has a lot of challenges, but this seems ridiculous!

What is the primary justification for them trying to implement something like this?  Is it weirdly trying to incentivize tenants to purchase the buildings?  Turn tenants into home owers...so many better ways than this...


 The intent behind this is to keep people in their homes and stop the progress of gentrification in these neighborhoods.

I agree that the deconversion of 2-4 units in Chicago is a huge problem. One thing I really like about this ordinance is every block will be limited to no more than 50% SFH. But this problem is city wide and is drastically reducing the housing stock in every neighborhood. That is the city's fault really as they are the ones who rezoned every side street to RS-3 and won't upzone existing 2-4 unit properties.

This was obviously written by people with no understanding of how real estate works.  You can't get rid of any tenants without just cause during the sale process and you have to keep tenants for 6 months after closing, even if their lease expires or is MTM.  So nobody can house hack unless the seller vacates a unit before listing - which does the exact opposite of what the ordinance is intended to do <face palm>

Post: Zoning Change RS-2

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114

@Kevin Harner - The meeting you are referring to are for different matters.  In this case only the alderman would be able to approve a zoning change and they do not hold public meetings on the decision making process.  I can tell you from a previous experience with Gardiner he will not spot zone (meaning changing one lot) no matter what the circumstance.  I had a seller who bought a 2 flat with coach house in 2018 and was given a 3 unit zoning cert from the city at closing.  They went to sell it last year and the city said it is a 2 unit and nobody legally converted the coach house.  We had proof this was done back in the 1990's and Gardiner refused to even take a meeting to discuss spot zoning the lot.  I even had a buddy who knows him personally try to get us a call back and he refused.  So my guess is this lot has been vacant for 3 years because they are hitting road blocks trying to upzone it.  So they have two options, build a smaller house or wait till someone else gets elected and try again.  

Post: Chicago Investors we have a serious problem : Call to Action

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Crystal Smith:

@Brie Schmidt- Thanks for posting this. I had no idea that this was being considered and I'm a little shocked that it passed.  We will spread the word through our network.


 It passed in October!  They originally made it effective immediately and we got them to extend it till March 1.  I am going to reach out with some resources 

Post: Chicago (Lincoln Park) : Rent out vs Sell and how to explore both

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Kyle Kulhanek:

Hello, I've been living in a 3br/3ba unit in Lincoln Park for approximately 5 years, and I have been intending to lease it out. However due to limited interest I've dropped the price, and I'm approaching my bottom limit, in which I likely believe it'd be a better financial decision to sell (obviously contingent on the sell price). Therefore, I'd like to get it listed, so I can explore both options at the same time.

As I start interviewing agents, any common pitfalls/things to consider when dealing with an agent when you still prefer to lease (ie would they expect to get the rental listing as well, etc.). I can see how there's a bit of a conflict of interests here, where the agent obviously prefers a sell, however I slightly prefer renting it.

Thanks in advance for any advice!


 Send me the address and I will pull comps.  I have been a landlord for 13+ years and never had a full month of vacancy unless I was doing a renovation, so something is off here

Post: Chicago Investors we have a serious problem : Call to Action

Brie Schmidt
ModeratorPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
  • Posts 6,159
  • Votes 5,114
Quote from @Joe S.:
Quote from @James Wise:
Quote from @Joe S.:

Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


 Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

So James,
I definitely am not disagreeing with what you said. With the above logic that you mentioned the question stands. Are politicians clueless that they are destroying the economics of the city for a vote or are they simply evil enough to destroy the economics for a vote????

Or is it option C….. evil and clueless. :-) Lol.


In this case it seems they are straight up clueless. Originally the tenants did not have to prove any financial capability before locking up the deal, so we fought it and got that changed. 25% of the housing stock is 2-4 unit properties and you can't vacate a tenant once you deliver the intent notice, even if their lease expires. You also can't vacate a tenant for 6 months after closing even if their lease expires - totally wiping out any househackers in this area of Chicago. They say lenders will still allow you to buy with an OO loan, which why obviously didn't talk to any lenders about it