Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

123
Posts
11
Votes
Robert Jenkins
  • Commercial Real Estate Agent
  • Encino - Los Angeles, CA
11
Votes |
123
Posts

Differed sales Trust (1031)

Robert Jenkins
  • Commercial Real Estate Agent
  • Encino - Los Angeles, CA
Posted

I was wondering if anyone is familiar with the Differed Sales Trust (DST) which is a "legal" substitute for the like kind 1031 exchange.

Where you can exchange from real estate into some sort of "annuity" but you can't exchange back, and you don't have to pay your cap gains.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,974
Posts
1,329
Votes
Bill Exeter
Pro Member
#2 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary
  • San Diego, CA
1,329
Votes |
1,974
Posts
Bill Exeter
Pro Member
#2 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary
  • San Diego, CA
Replied

The California Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") has ruled that certain types of installment sale transactions that have been "structured" or "drafted" pursuant to Section 453 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") and have been promoted and used to "save" failed 1031 Exchange transactions will not qualify for tax-deferred treatment in California when used in this manner.

California FTB is Aware of Certain Installment Arrangements

The FTB is aware of certain arrangements in which a 1031 Exchange investor and/or Qualified Intermediary attempt to convert proceeds from the sale of the investor's relinquished property that is part of a failed 1031 Exchange, or any unused proceeds from a partial 1031 Exchange, into an installment arrangement such as an installment note or other similar arrangement in which payments are to be paid out over two or more years.

It was made clear by the FTB that these arrangements do not qualify for a deferral of gain recognition under Sections 453 or 1031 of the Code since, among other reasons, these sections and the federal doctrine of constructive receipt do not support such a deferral of gain recognition.

These tax-deferred installment sale transaction structures have been promoted under various names over the years, including Private Annuity Trusts, Deferred Sales Trusts, Monetized Installment Sales, Self-Directed Installment Notes, among others.

Qualified Intermediaries Put On Notice

1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediaries must withhold and remit certain amounts to the California FTB when a 1031 Exchange either fully or partially fails. Qualified Intermediaries were put on notice by the California FTB through the issuance of California FTB Notice 2019-05 dated September 24, 2019. This notice was issued specifically to let Qualified Intermediaries know that the California FTB will impose failure to withhold penalties against the Qualified Intermediaries who actively participate in these installment sale transactions where boot or proceeds from a failed 1031 Exchange are converted into an installment sale or note or similar arrangement in which payments are to be paid out over two or more years.

Investor and Qualified Intermediary Beware

It is critical that investors have both their legal and tax advisors review any real estate transaction structure before proceeding, especially in cases where there is no guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and/or state taxing authorities. Interest and penalties can be devastating, so it is important that the investor knows and understands the risks involved with such transaction structures.

  • Bill Exeter
  • Loading replies...