General Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

Property Manager vs Investor--- An inherent conflict of interest?
I have a property management fee structure question for the forum.
I have several properties in Louisiana and I live in Georgia. I am under a typical property management agreement with an individual who has been fantastic. Pretty standard 10% rents collected though I do not have to pay if he finds a tenant for a vacant unit. Furthermore it’s written in the contract that I have to approve any expenses over $X therefore he does not make a dime over what I’m being charged and I can see and make the final decisions on the major repair work.
Reasons for this are simple- I want his interest as manager as closely aligned as possible to my interest as owner.
I’ve talked with a couple other owners who use the larger incorporated property management companies. Some common pricing themes I’ve been hearing 1) aprox 10% of rents, 2) a % of first month rent for finding a tenant, 3) charging a premium on contracted out major repairs and 4)nickel and diming on small repairs.
This seems like a massive conflict of interest. As a property management company you would better profit if there is a high turnover of tenants and there is constantly work being performed on the property. The exact opposite of what an investor would want.
So the question becomes has anyone out there come across a pricing/fee structure that better reconciles the interest of the management company and investor?
Most Popular Reply

Yes. I'm invested in a building in Baltimore and we wrestled with this question before hiring a management company. We finally came up with the following (I'm paraphrasing, obviously):
1. Fee is a % of rents; no fees for finding tenants.
2. Manager has to meet certain metrics: (a) low vacancy rate; (b) market rents -- we require them to check rents for comparable units in the neighborhood; (c) maintenance and repair costs stay at or below CPI, year over year; (d) tenant satisfaction -- we require them to publish a quarterly survey.
3. If manager exceeds metrics, we pay them a bonus; if manager meets metrics, we pay the base management fee; if they fail the metrics, we withhold a % of their fee, the amount of the % based on the level of their poor performance.
Now, we put out an RFP asking competitors to bid on these terms and a lot of them refused. One told us we were crazy. But a number did bid and we chose one. They hired a good on-site manager and she helped them hits "meets" a number of times; once or twice, they go an "exceeds." Our vacancy rate has been 0% for more than 10 years and we have very little tenant turnover.
Hope that helps.