I have a property management fee structure question for the forum.
I have several properties in Louisiana and I live in Georgia. I am under a typical property management agreement with an individual who has been fantastic. Pretty standard 10% rents collected though I do not have to pay if he finds a tenant for a vacant unit. Furthermore it’s written in the contract that I have to approve any expenses over $X therefore he does not make a dime over what I’m being charged and I can see and make the final decisions on the major repair work.
Reasons for this are simple- I want his interest as manager as closely aligned as possible to my interest as owner.
I’ve talked with a couple other owners who use the larger incorporated property management companies. Some common pricing themes I’ve been hearing 1) aprox 10% of rents, 2) a % of first month rent for finding a tenant, 3) charging a premium on contracted out major repairs and 4)nickel and diming on small repairs.
This seems like a massive conflict of interest. As a property management company you would better profit if there is a high turnover of tenants and there is constantly work being performed on the property. The exact opposite of what an investor would want.
So the question becomes has anyone out there come across a pricing/fee structure that better reconciles the interest of the management company and investor?