Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,451
Posts
462
Votes
Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
462
Votes |
1,451
Posts

Upside of a multiplex is limited by the upside of rent?

Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posted

I am in negotiations to purchase a triplex in an A neighborhood.

It is unique in that everything around it are SFRs.  There is literally no similar property nearby to comp.

I didn't use the SFR properties for comp.

I did an income expense analysis and the cap rate is barely over 6%(on my offer price, not the sellers asking price), hardly a good deal but with the current market and high insurance high property taxes good deals are few and far between especially in the better neighborhoods.

Even though nearby SFR homes have increased their values by a good bit last 2 years, the rent hasn't.

With the rent sort of stagnant, the triplex value is also limited accordingly, right?

I told the owner it has to cash flow and the numbers are the numbers and another investor would calculate this the same way, and 6% is already very marginal. It doesn't matter if the SFR next door increased value by 30%, his triplex rent money didn't go up by 30%.

I also told him he can probably get more out of an owner occupant who will live in one unit and rent out the other two.  Immediately the property tax is lowered with homestead, financing rate is better with OCs, and vacancy rate drops 30%, so they may be more inclined to pay more.

Makes sense? Or should the triplex be evaluated based on nearby SFR comps?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28
Posts
18
Votes
Jeff Stephens
  • Property Manager
  • Portland, OR
18
Votes |
28
Posts
Jeff Stephens
  • Property Manager
  • Portland, OR
Replied

@Sam Leon I have a triplex as well, and have often wondered what I could get for it if I sold it. In trying to figure that out, I've personally come to the opinion that a 3-4 unit building is sort of unique because it's right on the border between a SFR and a small apartment building. Like you, I would prefer to value the property using cap rates and NOI like apartments would be valued (which I perceive to be a more sophisticated analysis), but I think in reality a triplex is a very "retail" product. One broker pointed this out to me by asking me, "Jeff, who do you think buys triplexes?" My answer: Beginning or other small individual investors. So with that in mind, they are often not familiar with NOI and cap rates, but are very familiar with the simple notion of "sales comps." For that reason, I believe that when I go to sell my triplex, I will simply be paid the going rate for triplexes, whether that correlates with current cap rates or not.

All that is to say that in my own opinion, the rents going up or down a little in this triplex may not affect the triplex value as much as it would it it were a 5+ unit building. That's just my take.

Loading replies...