Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 9 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

756
Posts
1,095
Votes
Becca F.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
1,095
Votes |
756
Posts

Investing in California - pros and cons

Becca F.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
Posted

I'm a new investor (2019) with 2 properties (1 SFH solely owned and 1 apartment building, co-owned with family) in the Bay Area. I've also been investing in the Indianapolis area, more for cash flow and tax benefits (may be able to get REPS status by logging my hours but that's another topic). The appreciation on the CA properties far surpasses the Indiana ones. I've talked to several people and am aware that I could 1031 my Bay Area SFH with lots of equity to buy a multi-unit or many SFHs in the Midwest and possibly generate more cash flow. I don't plan to do that. I would rather own fewer solid properties than 50 or 100 cheaper properties.

I hear a lot about California being a terrible place to invest with landlord tenant laws. I haven't heard lots of horror stories, just mostly in Alameda County specifically with the COVID moratorium. One San Leandro landlord is owed $132,000 in back rent and in Oakland you can't discriminate against rental applicants with a criminal back ground (except sex offenders) and several stories of non-paying tenants which took thousands in legal fees to evict in Oakland. 

I'm interested in hearing from other CA investors, especially in the Bay Area. I've talked to a couple people successfully flipping here and doing BRRRRs. For long time investors who bought they're able to charge market rate rent and have relatively low monthly payments, either paid off property or low property taxes from Prop 31. For newer investors, they seem to be very high income earners (tech workers, physicians) or have lots of capital but it's tougher to buy here without a lot of money. 

If your a CA investor and 1031'd your properties to buy out of state, would be interested in hearing your experiences. What are your horror stories or success stories? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

518
Posts
242
Votes
Nate Meeker
  • Real Estate CPA | California
242
Votes |
518
Posts
Nate Meeker
  • Real Estate CPA | California
Replied

I am considering doing it the other way around.. I bought a bunch of rentals in FL during the pandemic and am going to 1031 them into CA for the risk of weather and appreciation benefits.

Some of my clients are doing pretty good with small-multi family in the Bay Area, but they are getting 20% discounts upfront by sourcing the deals themselves. 

Others are hitting the 1% rule in CA with ADUs and JDUs. 

Loading replies...