Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on .

User Stats

58
Posts
7
Votes
Daniel Alfandre
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Maryland
7
Votes |
58
Posts

Hire a superintendent (W-2) or a GC (1099)? - For small build-to-rent/sell business

Daniel Alfandre
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Maryland
Posted

I'm currently a superintendent for a SFH company and I'm looking to strike out on my own and build a mixture of 10-20 infill spec townhomes and duplexes a year. A GC would cost ~15% for each unit and a W-2 superintendent would cost ~$150 per year, not including employer expenses, possible WC payouts, liability insurance, etc.; but which would be cheaper, in my rough estimation, than paying a GC. However, even with good systems in place, I assume a W-2 superintendent would take a little more of my time to manage than a GC.

What do you think is a better route to take and why?