Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
4
Votes
Brian Lee
  • San Jose
4
Votes |
7
Posts

CA small Multi-family VS. Out-of-State small Multi-family?

Brian Lee
  • San Jose
Posted

Hi, I am trying to get into the real-estate and trying to buy my first property. But I am not sure what will be the best strategy to go with in this market. So I will be living in lower part of the Bay Area because of work, and my initial thought was to house hack with small multi-family property, but it seem like it's very tight market to make 0 or positive cash-flow. So I was thinking buying small multi-family units out-of-state for positive cashflow. Will it be better strategy to buy out-of-state rental property (small multi-family) first for positive cashflow or house-hack a small multi-family property in Bay Area?

Loading replies...