Land & New Construction
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply
To Get a Permit or Not to Get One
I am renovating my primary home that I plan to live in for 10+ year and probably much longer than that. We have had multiple contractors and others suggest maybe not getting permits due to the fact that the house is in an area that is somewhat isolated and often overlooked when it comes to building permit regulation. The house itself sits over 100 feet off the road which is not very well traveled.
I am not adding any square footage or removing any structural beams as far as I know at this point, but we are renovating nearly everything.
From my understanding below are the pros and cons. Is any of this inaccurate or unlikely or am I missing anything? Do you have any experience with this? What would you do?
Please give me your real world thoughts.
Pros To Getting Them:
1) Ensures contractor is following codes for potential better quality and safety
2) It could be easier to refinance and sell
Cons to Getting Them:
1) My taxes will likely go up
2) It will add a lot of time to our project
3) It will add a lot of cost to our project
4) It will take up a lot of my time because I would be pulling them
Pros to Not Getting Them:
1) The renovation could be completed much quicker and it will save me a lot of time
2) I will save money on taxes and permitting fees (including some permit requirements which might not actually make much of a difference)
Cons to Not Getting Them:
1) It could prevent a sale in the future - Is this even accurate? I haven't looked into permits for work done in houses that I have bought (maybe was a mistake), but looking for the real world answer here not the "by the book" answer
2) It could affect a refinance - Is this even true?
3) I could be fined. - This isn't clear on what the fines would be online. Any details on that?
4) The house could be less safe
5) My homeowners insurance deny a claim if they tie a fire or other issue to not having building permits. - Is this likely?
Most Popular Reply
![Michael Hayworth's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/317897/1621443832-avatar-mhayworth.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
I own a contracting firm with 12 in-house crews working 50 hours a week, 52 weeks a year, as well as a plumbing company. I deal with more permits and inspections in a month than most people will deal with in a lifetime. The idea that permits, licenses, and inspections make work better is simply laughable. What they mainly are is an industry protection scheme promoted originally by union plumbers and electricians and now continued by all the licensed trades to keep outsides from cutting into their profits.
First, most building inspectors are just about useless. They are typically guys who failed in the trades and decided they would go become an inspector. Can't tell you how many inspectors I know who "used to have" a plumbing business, electrical business, or whatever. I've never met an inspector - and I know dozens of them - that I'd trust to frame a new build, plumb a bathroom remodel, or wire a room addition. If they were any good, they'd make way more doing the work than inspecting the work.
Second, there's no way they actually understand the entirety of the IRC, so they all develop their little picky things that they will call out on every visit. Most of these little picky things have nothing to do with overall quality. So contractors learn, "Oh, this is in Bill's zone. Be sure to add extra expanding foam in all the corners, but be sure to miss one so he can have something to point out to you. Then ask him about his fishing boat." Doesn't add a thing to the overall quality of your job. It's just part of playing along with the legal game.
Sure, they can recognize really terrible work and may save someone from that. But with REI groups, Angie's List, HomeAdvisor and all the other referral sources out there, the only reason you'd be hiring a terrible contractor is if you picked the absolutely lowest bidder without regard to references....don't do that.
As for licensed contractors, I have seen truly abysmal work performed by licensed contractors - not just tradesmen or journeyman, but guys with master's licenses in plumbing or electrical. They're good at passing a test. Maybe not so good at installing plumbing so it doesn't leak. Texas, where I live, doesn't have licensing for general contractors. We've had a huge construction boom here for years, even when the rest of the country was in the dumps. If we've had a rash of houses falling down due to lack of GC licensing, I've missed it. Meanwhile, some states feel they need to license painters. Your tax dollars at work, protecting homeowners from a bad paint job. (Not really, the licensed guys still often do crappy work.)
People say permits don't cost that much. That's simply not true. The cost of permits is not just what the city charges you. It's that you're then required to use a licensed electrician to do simple crap like move a vanity light, or install a can light. And that licensed electrician either reports to a master electrician, or uses an RME (Responsible Master Electrician) to pull the electrical permit, and that guy wants to get paid. So the light that your handyman could relocate for $50 now becomes 3-4x that.
Want to install a new tub and plumb it? Any decent handyman can do that work in a day, probably at $50/hour or so. But pull a permit and now you have to have a licensed plumber, who's got a master plumber upline to pull plumbing permits, do the work at $150/hour. Except you still need your handyman, because God knows a plumber isn't going to actually install and caulk the surround on the tub.
Permits kinda make sense for really large jobs, where contractors might be tempted to cut corners. They definitely don't make sense on the average bathroom or kitchen remodel, or other typical cosmetic work.
Now all that said, would I trust a $40K job to a handyman? Probably not. But different people use that term in different ways. In our area, it means "a guy who does mediocre work in a bunch of different areas." But I hear in other areas, people actually use it with pride. So maybe your guy is one of those.
All that said, if you've had multiple reputable contractors - emphasis on reputable, make sure they're that - tell you they'd skip a permit on your job in that particular area, with that set of circumstances, I'd be a lot more likely to listen to them than a bunch of internet strangers (me included).