Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

58
Posts
7
Votes
Daniel Alfandre
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Maryland
7
Votes |
58
Posts

Hire a superintendent (W-2) or a GC (1099)? - For small build-to-rent/sell business

Daniel Alfandre
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Maryland
Posted

I'm currently a superintendent for a SFH company and I'm looking to strike out on my own and build a mixture of 10-20 infill spec townhomes and duplexes a year. A GC would cost ~15% for each unit and a W-2 superintendent would cost ~$150 per year, not including employer expenses, possible WC payouts, liability insurance, etc.; but which would be cheaper, in my rough estimation, than paying a GC. However, even with good systems in place, I assume a W-2 superintendent would take a little more of my time to manage than a GC.

What do you think is a better route to take and why?

Loading replies...