Land & New Construction
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
1031 Exchanges
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec919/ec91916104d3e41548498b7b5e711befdac0c431" alt="Daniel Alfandre's profile image"
Hire a superintendent (W-2) or a GC (1099)? - For small build-to-rent/sell business
I'm currently a superintendent for a SFH company and I'm looking to strike out on my own and build a mixture of 10-20 infill spec townhomes and duplexes a year. A GC would cost ~15% for each unit and a W-2 superintendent would cost ~$150 per year, not including employer expenses, possible WC payouts, liability insurance, etc.; but which would be cheaper, in my rough estimation, than paying a GC. However, even with good systems in place, I assume a W-2 superintendent would take a little more of my time to manage than a GC.
What do you think is a better route to take and why?