Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 years ago,

User Stats

64
Posts
23
Votes
Chris Morris
  • Los Angeles, CA
23
Votes |
64
Posts

architects disagree on necessity of civil engineering services...

Chris Morris
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Architect A estimated I would need to pay $10K-$15K for civil engineering services for a 2 story ADU on a flat lot in Los Angeles.

They say it is for grading and low impact development/stormwater management).

Architect B thinks the civil engineering services could possibly be avoided entirely:

"Grading shouldnt be significant and not need design work.

FYI: Your property is in a special zone that requires extra hoops to jump through for grading, but I have only seen that triggered when excavating for a basement parking level. This would be an item that goes wrong, but is not anticipated.

LID/Stormwater can be covered by the architect/client with some simple notes and provisions for the project."

Any thoughts? Who is closer to the truth? 

Also, Architect B, if you see this post, no disrespect. I don't have experience in this area and am reaching out for more opinions. :-)

Loading replies...