Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Sonny Sach's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/224060/1694571062-avatar-sonnysach.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
Is IRR a good metric for a multi-family investment?
Hello all,
I am looking at a few multi-family opportunities and the other investors have sent me packages which use IRR. Is that a good metric? Are there other ones that may be better at evaluating an opportunity? I know usually we speak about CAC, ROI or ROE.
Thanks,
Sonny
Most Popular Reply
![Brian Burke's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/112956/1621417531-avatar-cirrusav8or.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=800x800@0x62/cover=128x128&v=2)
- Investor
- Santa Rosa, CA
- 6,907
- Votes |
- 2,283
- Posts
IRR is the most common metric for comparing one real estate opportunity against another, and in my experience it is the one that most investors prioritize. Many investors take the easy route and glance at the IRR and form a conclusion in their mind as to whether the deal is good, or not. This is a very shallow view, however. There is so much more to it.
Most importantly is that an IRR forecast is only as good as the assumptions behind the forecasts in which the calculation is based. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. It's critically important that you examine the underwriting and assumptions made in arriving at any particular performance projection to see if the projections make sense and are reasonably achievable. Bad underwriting is the primary failure point for most IRR comparisons, and it makes it tough to make apples-to-apples comparisons across various sponsors/brokers/investors because some underwrite very reasonably, or even conservatively, others underwrite aggressively, and yet others underwrite as if they live on another planet.
Another consideration is that what is desirable to you in an investment dictates which performance indicator to focus on most. If you are most interested in cash flow and don't care much about capital growth, Cash-on-Cash return is a better meter to focus on. If you are more interested in growth, and not interested in cash flow, equity multiple could be the focus, if you couple that with hold period timing.
There's no absolute answer that covers everyone, but what IRR does is it takes into account the amount of cash flows, the direction of cash flows, and the timing of cash flows to quantify results that you can then compare to other similar options. Just be sure you focus less on the number and more on how that number was calculated.