Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

43
Posts
26
Votes
Eric Hamm
Pro Member
  • Developer
  • Merced, CA
26
Votes |
43
Posts

What do YOU look for?

Eric Hamm
Pro Member
  • Developer
  • Merced, CA
Posted

I'm new to MF investing. I've heard the SFR guys and gals talk about what they must see in a deal in order to pull the trigger - for instance:

I've heard people say, any deal I'm looking at MUST:

* Have $200/month minimum cash flow

* 12% Cash on Cash Return

* Must meet the 2% Rule

Etc....

I'm curious, when it comes to MF (and apartments specifically), are there any minimum requirements you all are looking for in a deal?

I sincerely apologize if this question has already been asked and answered on the forum.  I looked, but couldn't find it...thus this post!  All responses are welcome!

  • Eric Hamm
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...