Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
1031 Exchanges
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b41e/6b41ec343542160c59468cccc2adc86c0212ecc8" alt="Jennifer Brown's profile image"
Job Growth or Job Stagnation? Which Location is Better?
I watched a video recently on a guy whose strategy in choosing a multifamily investment location is to find slower job growth. His philosophy is if wages are stagnant, then there won't be any raised rents and therefore, there won't be any merchant builders adding new product to the area. Thus being one of the only good renting options.
Now on the same token, I've also seen that in choosing a location, you should make sure there is job growth and population growth.
So my question is what are the pros/cons of both methods? I'm not even sure the first option is a good strategy so I'm anxious to get people's opinions!