Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

477
Posts
426
Votes
Jason V.
  • Investor
  • Rochester, NY
426
Votes |
477
Posts

Solutions for Net Worth Requirement on Commercial Financing

Jason V.
  • Investor
  • Rochester, NY
Posted

One of the things I keep hearing regarding commercial loans is that lenders typically want your (the borrower) to have a net worth that exceeds the amount of the loan. Is this something that investors are getting a pass on for their first larger MF property? Or are they working around it in other ways?

If I were to "partner" with a higher net worth individual, who's only contribution would be bringing their net worth and signature to a deal, does that fly? If I'm not borrowing from them, or relying on them for anything else, what would be fair compensation? 

Thanks all!

Loading replies...