Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on .

User Stats

62
Posts
7
Votes
Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
7
Votes |
62
Posts

Adapting the 70% Rule for Multi-Family

Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
Posted

Since property value of MF is determined by NOI and CAP rates, there are three ways to affect property price: Revenue, Expenses, and CAP negotiations.

Specifically in the 20-100 unit space, if we define market as average rents, average expenses, and average CAP, my question is whether 70% below market is enough in MF, or if we really need a 60% Rule?

To break it down, What would be a) minimum below market rents/above market vacancies, b) above market expenses, and c) better than average CAP rates that you would consider to be bare minimums to consider a deal?