Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

62
Posts
7
Votes
Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
7
Votes |
62
Posts

Adapting the 70% Rule for Multi-Family

Seth C.
  • Investor
  • Monterey, CA
Posted

Since property value of MF is determined by NOI and CAP rates, there are three ways to affect property price: Revenue, Expenses, and CAP negotiations.

Specifically in the 20-100 unit space, if we define market as average rents, average expenses, and average CAP, my question is whether 70% below market is enough in MF, or if we really need a 60% Rule?

To break it down, What would be a) minimum below market rents/above market vacancies, b) above market expenses, and c) better than average CAP rates that you would consider to be bare minimums to consider a deal?