Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
1031 Exchanges
presented by
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 10 years ago on .
Adapting the 70% Rule for Multi-Family
Since property value of MF is determined by NOI and CAP rates, there are three ways to affect property price: Revenue, Expenses, and CAP negotiations.
Specifically in the 20-100 unit space, if we define market as average rents, average expenses, and average CAP, my question is whether 70% below market is enough in MF, or if we really need a 60% Rule?
To break it down, What would be a) minimum below market rents/above market vacancies, b) above market expenses, and c) better than average CAP rates that you would consider to be bare minimums to consider a deal?