Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
6
Votes
Sean Peters
  • Developer
  • Portsmouth, NH
6
Votes |
24
Posts

Below market rent: Is it better to buy with tenants in place or without tenants?

Sean Peters
  • Developer
  • Portsmouth, NH
Posted

I am offering on a 5 unit multi-family in a fairly stable rental market. I have been going back and forth on the best strategy to close this deal, whether to ask the seller to remove all tenants, or to purchase as-is with the current below market leases.

The property needs minor cosmetic improvements in all units in order to get full market rent. All 5 units are occupied with month-to-month leases. 

So...in deciding the best strategy, my big questions are:

1-Should I buy without any tenants? (if the seller is even willing to evict them)

2-Shoud I purchase with the tenants and then evict them all at once so that I can do the necessary renovations as quickly as possible and get all new full market paying renters I estimate I can renovate entire building within 8 weeks) 

3- Should I renovate the apartments one-by-one (I estimate this would take me 6 months)

I would really like to hear some thoughts on this situation! Thank you! - Sean

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
3,246
Votes |
4,456
Posts
Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
Replied

I was an apartment manager, so from my perspective, if I was to manage this building for you, and you gave me the choices above, I'd say, empty that building and do the renovations, and then let me find great tenants of my choosing, to be moved into freshly renovated apartments, who will be happy to pay the higher rent.

Why?  Because you will likely have at least some problems with the existing tenants.  First simply because they will be afraid of a new landlord.  Next, when you start kicking tenants out to do renovations, the ones left behind will be unhappy campers, knowing they will be next and/or the rent will be increased significantly.  Then, you may have some you have to evict.  Odds are good, they won't want to stay and pay higher rent, or move out and back in to pay higher rent.  And you'll be dealing with all of their security deposit issues, and any small claims court actions that rise up out of that.

I could be wrong, they may all happily go into the sunset or move out and want to move back in and pay higher rent - but that's not likely.  

Plus, they will be saying things like, "My old landlord did things like this...or my old landlord didn't require that..."

It would just be nice and easy and clean to get all fresh tenants who are happy to be moving into your freshly done units and paying the rent you asked.

From a financial standpoint, you'll have to ask an investor. 

Loading replies...