Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,451
Posts
462
Votes
Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
462
Votes |
1,451
Posts

Rent Restricted Properties

Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posted

Looking at some properties in a community that does not allow rental during the first year.

That basically makes it a buy/flip. I prefer to buy and hold to rent.

Any creative ideas on any way to avoid the property from sitting idle?

If it's a short sale, would renting back to the seller - basically allowing them to stay beyond the sale date be "within the rules"?

I am pretty sure the answer is no...I just wanted to make sure.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,451
Posts
8,349
Votes
Steve Babiak
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Audubon, PA
8,349
Votes |
13,451
Posts
Steve Babiak
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Audubon, PA
Replied

"Contract for deed", "land contract", "installment sale" - whatever is used in that area would have been the way to "rent" without it being a "rental property". The SAFE Act makes that a bit trickier these days.

This did come up in another recent discussion, courtesy of Bill Gulley:
http://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/52/topics/93062?page=1#p580339

Loading replies...